I continue the website's occasional series on refuse collection around the world with a photograph taken on the banks of the Grand Canal during our recent holiday to the Adriatic area. The boat was tied up alongside the cafe close to the famous Accademia Art Gallery.
Afficionados will be pleased to see that the rubbish barge has separate containers for different waste types, implying that recycling of a kind is being carried out in the city.
I am not sure if the old mattress on the top of the vessel is for the operator's siesta, or if it is on the way to the tip!
Sunday, October 16, 2016
Tuesday, October 11, 2016
The problem with polls (and a chance to participate in another 'consultation')
All sorts of polls, whether elections,
referenda, petitions or surveys, are to a greater or lesser extent flawed
because those who participate can never be in command of all the facts. The situation is particularly extreme in the case of
petitions since they are necessarily promoted by those on just one side of an argument. They of course have no incentive to present a
balanced view, they just want as many signatures as possible.
In recent weeks there have been two
polls, the Mori Poll about Devolution to Norfolk and Suffolk and the heavily
promoted and supported petition with regard to the Bus Station in Sudbury, Sadly in both cases, participants appear to
have suffered from ignorance of the facts.
In the case of the Mori poll on Devolution, a
good proportion of participants questioned confessed to having little or no
knowledge of the subject. This did not
however prevent them from taking part!
Similarly, In the case of the
petition with regard to the bus station, I do wonder whether those who signed
it really understand the whole picture.
I am not always a great fan of every
aspect of Babergh District Council’s activities, particularly in the area of
planning, but I think that in recent years Simon Barrett and his colleagues
have worked hard to try to arrest the decline of the town centre in
Sudbury. Many market towns are currently
suffering from high business rates, a plethora of charity shops, the growth of online
shopping etc. etc., and positive action is necessary if we are not to see town
centres such as Sudbury’s becoming further run down.
One very positive step has been the
very real support that Babergh has provided in helping Gainsborough’s House to
fulfil its dream of creating new and exciting additional gallery and other facilities.
As far as the bus station is
concerned, the council should also be
congratulated on its far sighted attempts to develop the Hamilton Road
area. A solution to the siting of the
bus station cannot be seen in isolation, but as part of this wider
scheme.
Going along to see what is actually being proposed as
far as the design of the new bus station is concerned is a good way for all of
us to start to separate fact from fiction
Public consultation events will be
held in Sudbury Town Hall between 5 p.m. and 8 p.m. on Friday 14th
October and from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on Saturday 15th October.
There will also be a display
exhibition in Sudbury Town Hall from Monday 3 October to Tuesday 25 October.
Sudbury Town Hall is open from 9am to 4.30pm, Monday to Friday.
Following the consultation, feedback
will be incorporated into the planning application for a new Sudbury Bus
Station. There will also be the opportunity for the public to give their views
on the full planning application later in the year.
The consultation closes on Tuesday 25
October 2016. To view the proposed designs and to complete the consultation
survey, visit www.suffolk.gov.uk/sudburybus
Thursday, September 22, 2016
District Councils to move to Ipswich
![]() |
| Babergh offices, closing shortly? |
This decision has not been universally welcomed and I do not
find this surprising. Firstly, there are legitimate concerns about
the economic impact of closing two reasonably large offices in the centre
of two market towns. Bearing in mind the enthusiasm of many District
councillors for stimulating economic growth in their areas, almost to the
exclusion of any other goal, the decision on the face of it seems perverse.
Secondly it could be regarded as inappropriate for a
District Council (the clue is in the name!) to move its headquarters to
premises outside its district. We are assured however that residents will
not be inconvenienced. It is the plan to locate ‘satellite offices’ in
towns around the districts. Only time
will tell if this will give residents adequate access to officers.
In any event the decision has now been made and, barring
accidents, there will be an influx of District Council officers into the
offices currently occupied by Suffolk County Council.
Many people, including myself, have for some time been in
favour of scrapping the distinction between District and County Councils and
forming one or more unitary authorities for Suffolk. The move of the Districts into SCC offices
could throw up some interesting worked examples of the benefits of this idea.
In this connection, coincidentally, yesterday I was
contacted by a resident about a planning matter which concerns both Babergh and
the County Council. Some difficulties had arisen with regard to drainage (a County
Council responsibility) and inevitably there had been some considerable delay
as e mails were exchanged between the two teams of officers involved.
Then one of the key officers at the County Council went on holiday resulting in
further time wasted. When I was speaking to the manager of the County Council
drainage department, trying to move things
forward, he commented that once the Babergh officers are sitting in the same
building, a lot of this to-ing and fro-ing ought to be avoided.
Let’s hope that he is right, because if he is the move to Ipswich
may quicken things up in the short term and, possibly, lead to greater things in the long
term.
Labels:
Babergh,
Babergh policy,
Mid Suffolk,
Suffolk County Council
Sunday, September 18, 2016
Lavenham Children's Book Festival
Lavenham is a great place to be if you are a young reader!
Today I was very honoured to be asked to present
the medals and certificates at the Lavenham Library Reading Challenge
awards. This year some 40 children
completed the task of reading 6 books during the summer holidays. Congratulations to all of them! After the presentation ceremony we were entertained by an excellent magician, and a good time was had by all.
Literary activities for children in Lavenham will continue
during Half Term, when the first Lavenham Children’s Book Festival will take
place. The Festival is being arranged by the organisers of the very popular
Lavenham Literary Festival. Events will
take place in the village hall or at the Swan Hotel over the 28th and 29th
October.
The programme looks very enticing and includes opportunities
to meet the authors of children’s books,
storytelling sessions, creative writing workshops and also workshps for
budding artists and illustrators.
The Festival is open to all, but all children attending must
be accompanied by an adult (whose entry is included in the child’s
ticket). Some of the events may well be
of interest to unaccompanied adults too, and they will be very welcome. For example the author of the highly
acclaimed Viking Sagas, Kevin Crossley Holland will be talking about his work,
and I happen to know that his books are certainly read by people of all ages.
Full details about the Festival and the opportunity to
purchase tickets can be found HERE.
Friday, September 16, 2016
LWHS Winter Season 2016/17
![]() |
| Come and hear about our Angel Roofs. |
Little Waldingfield History Society has recently
published its very enticing programme of events for the 2016/17 season.
A summary is on the LWHS tab above.
The sessions start on the evening of Wednesday 21st
September with a fascinating talk by Roger Green who will divulge all about a
19th Century family scandal involving a local clergyman in Sudbury.
Other highlights include a talk about the USAAF in the
region, ‘Overpaid, oversexed and over here’, and there is another later in the year about the
magnificent Angel Roofs of East Anglia.
In May Mark Bills, the Director of Gainsborough’s House,
will talk about Thomas Gainsborough, and I expect he will not miss the
opportunity to tell the group about the exciting developments that are expected
at the museum in coming years. The
season concludes in June with a talk about Joan of Arc.
All talks are held at the Parish Rooms in Little
Waldingfield at 7.30.
Information about the Society can be obtained from Diana Langford on 01787 248298
Sunday, September 11, 2016
September harvest!
![]() |
| My patch. |
I decided to contain my efforts by buying a raised bed, which somehow made the whole idea less daunting. I could persuade myself that this was little more than a large window box! I also told myself that I should not get too downhearted about failure. I had little clue about what I was doing but no doubt would learn from my mistakes.
I sowed three crops in a space that is 4 feet by 6. Almost half of the bed is taken up by some french beans. I actually prefer these to runner beans. I think they are more versatile since they can be eaten hot or cold. They also don't need support in theory, but the plants are a bit floppy. I am not sure what to do about this and any suggestions would be very welcome. They have cropped well though giving us enough beans for several meals, and really do taste better than the shop bought ones.
I have also grown some rainbow chard, which can be eaten raw or cooked like spinach. The taste is a bit soapy when raw, but it mixes in well with other leaves, and the plants keep on giving more,
Finally I have some beetroot coming on. At present results are a bit patchy, with some plants clearly forming a good root but others still looking a bit skinny. I do love beetroot however, and I am looking forward to enjoying some borscht later in the year, and also mixing the beets up with horseradish for eating with roast beef and smoked fish, just like my granny used to do!
I am thinking of getting another bed in order to try some carrots and strawberries next year.
A tale of two polls
![]() |
| Lavenham, where the Neighbourhood Plan Referendum took place on Thursday. |
Last week we had news of how two very different sorts of
community engagement turned out, and the contrast is interesting.
On Thursday we heard that Lavenham’s community referendum
had approved the village’s Neighbourhood Plan. 91.6% of those who voted were in favour of the
proposals. The turnout was 36%, above
the average for such referenda, which to date has been 32%.
Earlier in the week we received some initial numbers from
the community engagement exercise on the Norfolk/Suffolk Devolution plans. The number of responses received was a little
over 10,000. Since the population of
Suffolk and Norfolk amounts to roughly 1.6m souls, even allowing for the fact
that some of these are children, this is a pretty paltry response, amounting to
well under 1%. This is a very small
sample by any reckoning.
Moreover a deeper look at the numbers show that of this
small group of people around 50% had any
knowledge of devolution within England, with just over 8% claiming to know ‘a
good deal’. In contrast, given the
length of time that it has taken for the Lavenham Neighbourhood Plan to evolve,
those who voted in Lavenham were well informed about the issues involved. Unlike the Devo proposals which were
handed down from on high, the Neighbourhood Plan was built from the bottom up;
an example of local democracy in action.
It is not too late to have your say on the Devolution question. However, if you are going to do so, do take
time to look at the actual proposals and don’t just read the superficially
attractive headlines.
You should the ask yourself:
- Is this really devolution or is it just another layer of Government?
- Is this really democratic? Do smaller parties, for example, get their say?
- Is the money on offer particularly significant in the overall scheme of things?
We will be voting at the County Council on these proposals
on Wednesday 2nd November. I am happy to discuss the issues with anyone who contacts me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





