'By giving planning permission to this development today you will be giving the green light to an act of vandalism. You will be bowing to short term demands which will destroy for ever an environment that has been developed over many centuries.
This does not have to happen. There is a better way.'
The claims of economic growth and heritage assets – are they really incompatible? I think not.
However this is the only conclusion that can be drawn from the
very sad decision made by Babergh’s Development Committee today to approve
Prolog’s application to build two vast warehouses on land adjacent to Chilton
Hall and Chilton Church.
Moated Chilton Hall |
Frankly, little attention was paid by the majority of the
committee to the importance of the historical buildings. They were clearly of the opinion that the
need for jobs in the area is so overwhelming that all other considerations are
of minor importance. Their views were
not shared by a number of organisations, both local (Suffolk Preservation
Society and Sudbury Society) and national (including English Heritage), all of
whom wrote strong objections to the plans.
The decision, which is of questionable legality, sets an
unfortunate precedent and in my opinion sends the wrong message with regard to
how the council values our built environment, a built environment which,
incidentally, is among the most outstanding in England.
In addition to Frank Lawrenson and me, Peter Clifford, Val
Hart and a representative from the Suffolk Preservation Society spoke against
the application.
In my speech, reproduced on a separate ‘tab’ above, I tried
to point out that jobs could still be accommodated if a less obtrusive
development were presented, or if Prolog were to locate their buildings on the
far less sensitive site at Chilton Woods.
Frank Lawrenson also spoke eloquently, making the excellent
point that tourism is one of the largest employers in Suffolk. If we continue to compromise our historical
assets however, there will be nothing left to visit.
Everyone else made a good showing too, but it was impossible
to shake the conviction of those who believed, wrongly in my opinion, that a
vote against the plans was a vote against jobs and the prosperity of the area.
The Cranes sleep on in Chilton Church in happy oblivion |
It's more than possible to accommodate our heritage needs and our employment needs. Too often there seems to be a race to the bottom - who can have the most post industrial society going. Home prices in Babergh command a premium above the average Suffolk prices. This is founded on quality of life - not on who can get a job in a packaging, distribution and warehouse operation. Important as such jobs are, it should be possible for them not to obtrude onto the nicer aspects of our society.
ReplyDelete