Unsurprisingly, the withdrawal of Kings
Lynn and West Norfolk council from the devolution process resulted in the
Government scrapping the deal. In
Norfolk all further meetings to discuss the matter were cancelled. In Suffolk however it was decided, following
some encouragement from the Government, that we should attempt to conclude a
deal for Suffolk alone (which might include some willing partners from Norfolk
and/or Essex.)
Accordingly the meeting scheduled for
yesterday to approve the Norfolk/Suffolk deal went ahead. We were asked to debate the following
‘amendment’ to the motion:
That Council agrees:
1.
To reiterate the commitment, given at its June meeting, to Devolution as a
means for delivering accelerated growth in the local and national economy and
helping local people and places fulfil their potential;
2.
To authorise the Leader and Chief Executive to:
a) seek an urgent meeting with the
Secretary of State to discuss the Government’s intentions around devolution;b) work with Government and local partners to agree an alternative devolution deal as soon as possible
3.
That further reports are presented to the Authority, as appropriate, as the
Devolution process progresses.
During
the course of yesterday it was not possible to obtain any clear impression of what a
revised devolution arrangement for Suffolk alone would look like. However, I feel sure that any
revised scheme would be similar in structure to what was previously proposed
and would result in an unnecessary and expensive extra layer of government. Nonetheless, there seemed no harm in seeing what is actually on offer. I might be proved wrong after all. Having voted against the motion last time, on this occasion therefore I decided to abstain.
The
motion was carried by 57 votes, with 7 councillors abstaining.
As the
County Council faces many pressing problems at present, including sorting out
the dismal highways situation and finding savings to fill a large budget gap, I am unable to escape the impression that devolution continues to be a major
distraction and that we are guilty of fiddling while Rome burns.
No comments:
Post a Comment